Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Republicans Are in Denial - WSJ.com

Tom Coburn has a great op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal, but the ending falls flat.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121184690228421415.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

Becoming Republicans again will require us to come to grips with what has ailed our party – namely, the triumph of big-government Republicanism and failed experiments like the K Street Project and "compassionate conservatism." If the goal of the K Street Project was to earmark and fund raise our way to a filibuster-proof "governing" majority, the goal of "compassionate conservatism" was to spend our way to a governing majority.

The fruit of these efforts is not the hoped-for Republican governing majority, but the real prospect of a filibuster-proof Democrat majority in 2009. While the K Street Project decimated our brand as the party of reform and limited government, compassionate conservatism convinced the American people to elect the party that was truly skilled at activist government: the Democrats.

Compassionate conservatism's starting point had merit. The essential argument that Republicans should orient policy around how our ideas will affect the poor, the widow, the orphan, the forgotten and the "other" is indisputable – particularly for those who claim, as I do, to submit to an authority higher than government. Yet conservatives are conservatives because our policies promote deliverance from poverty rather than dependence on government.

Compassionate conservatism's next step – its implicit claim that charity or compassion translates into a particular style of activist government involving massive spending increases and entitlement expansion – was its undoing. Common sense and the Scriptures show that true giving and compassion require sacrifice by the giver. This is why Jesus told the rich young ruler to sell his possessions, not his neighbor's possessions. Spending other people's money is not compassionate.

[...]

Regaining our brand is not about "messaging." It's about action. It's about courage. It's about priorities. Most of all, it's about being willing to give up our political careers so our grandkids don't have to grow up in a debtor's prison, or a world in which other nations can tell a weakened and bankrupt America where we can and can't defend liberty, pursue terrorists, or show compassion.

Yes, good stuff.  Maybe there's hope for the GOP.

And then this last paragraph is tacked on...

John McCain, for all his faults, is the one Republican candidate who can lead us through our wilderness. Mr. McCain is not running on a messianic platform or as a great healer of dysfunctional Republicans who refuse to help themselves. His humility is one of his great strengths. In his heart, he's a soldier who sees one more hill to charge, one more mission to complete.

You just lost me.  John McCain is in favor of creating a huge new bureaucracy to implement a cap-and-trade "solution" to carbon emissions in order to battle the mythical crisis of Global Warming.  That will cost us billions for no practical benefit other than "feeling better" about the planet.  John McCain is for amnesty for illegal aliens so that they can benefit equally from our welfare state and take full advantage of American taxpayers.  John McCain touts campaign finance reform as a great accomplishment, but all it amounts to is a major abridgment of First Amendment rights designed to quell criticism of incumbent politicians.  I judge him as a disaster for conservative hopes for the GOP.  It's better to lose an election than to lose your soul.

On the other hand, I like Tom Coburn and I hope he gets a chance to rebuild the Republican party.

No comments: