Derb's article: "The Talk: Nonblack Version" is here:
http://takimag.com/article/the_talk_nonblack_version_john_derbyshire
Lowry's announcement is here:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/295514/parting-ways-rich-lowry
Mark Steyn reacts:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/295591/re-derb-mark-steyn
> I regret the loss of John Derbyshire to National Review. Short version: Didn’t like the piece, but don’t think NR should have hustled him into the drive-thru guillotine on the basis of 24 hours of hysteria from the Internet’s sans-culottes.
> NR shouldn’t be rewarding those who want to play this game. The more sacrifices you offer up, the more ravenously the volcano belches.
>> PS If Derb’s piece is sufficiently beyond the pale that its author must be terminated immediately, why is its publisher — our old friend Taki — proudly listed on the NR masthead?
Derb has more to say here:
http://takimag.com/article/talking_back_john_derbyshire
----
My take: If you don't like what Derb wrote, refute it in writing. You don't owe him a job, but you do owe him an argument. Don't just dismiss him as offensive with the implication that he's a racist. As a result of this incident, I am canceling my subscription to National Review. It's too bad it had to end this way.
No comments:
Post a Comment